DS: During the developmental part of this, we invited Ian McHarg to Aspen along with others. There were half a dozen people that were in the vanguard of environmentally sensitive development and we had basically town meetings. And Ian McHarg was one of the people. He was a Scottish architect and land use planner who had developed a system for what I just described, mapping out. You map out the areas of sensitivity or special cultural or other values and you basically do it with like acetate overlays and then you lay them over each other on the land map and then the areas that don't have anything on them, theoretically, are the areas that would be the most suitable for development. And then you-then you orient those to where you want utilities and how you want growth patterns so you don't leapfrog outside the urban areas. But in general, it was a methodology that was intended to preserve the good-the good environmental qualities in any area. It's still used today-used extensively. Actually we've used it here too. So based on that, my lawyer colleague and I on the commission developed these land use maps which were created by our-the equivalent of A&M-Texas A&M. In that case, it was Colorado State University, which is our Ag school. And then used that mapping again, which is still used today, to identify wildlife corridors, calving areas, things of that nature, riparian areas. And those were mapped out so that development could not intrude on them. And what we found, generally, was we typically enhanced the value of the property where-and so the unintended results is we supported high quality, high cost development in our community that created a whole other set of problems. But the-the mapping was the key to it. You want to wait? We'll see, we have boats going back and forth. The bottom line was, based on the mapping, we were able then to design zone maps and zoning categories that, in many cases, called research-resource areas with large lots and extensive conservation.(misc.)0:11:10 - 2121