AEJMC Trailblazers of Diversity Interview with Frank Montero

  • Speaker 1: Good morning, it's Tuesday, August 7 2018.  
  • And this is George Daniels from University of  Alabama. We're in Washington DC talking today with  
  • Frank Montero for the AMC oral history project.  The reports from this interview will actually  
  • be available on the AMC website, and also the  Briscoe Center for American history website.  
  • Frank, thank you so much for talking with us  today. But the first question I have is to tell us  
  • a little bit about where you grew up in your early  life. Just a little bit of how you get started.
  • Speaker 2: Sure, George would be a pleasure, and it's good  
  • to be here. So I am originally born and raised  in Brooklyn, New York. I am the youngest son  
  • of parents from the Galicia part of Spain,  which is that portion of Spain that's in the  
  • upper northwest corner. And my parents actually  met in New York during the Second World War.  
  • And, and there, you know, ran a small Bar and  Grill back near the Brooklyn waterfront when  
  • the waterfront was very active. And, back  in those days, that portion of Brooklyn was  
  • very ethnic, very Spanish, a lot of Spanish  and Puerto Ricans in that part near the  
  • waterfront. A lot of them worked on the piers,  my father who had been a merchant sailor, and,  
  • and the, the, the seeds were planted there. We all  learned, my brothers and I had to speak Spanish.  
  • And we spoke Spanish as the primary  language in our household growing up.  
  • And, and also during the summers, we actually  
  • would spend time with my grandparents who  also spoke Spanish all the time, as well.  
  • So we very much grew up even though we were in  Brooklyn, in New York, immersed in, in Spanish  
  • language and Spanish culture. And it's been  very much a part of my identities all my life.
  • Speaker 1: So you are practicing law  
  • here in the Washington DC area, talk about some  of the work that you do in that particular area.  
  • What are the types of clients you have? What are  the types of cases that come through your hands?
  • Speaker 2: Sure, I'm the managing partner  
  • of the law firm of Fletcher hielden. Hildreth,  and we are a communications law firm here in  
  • Washington resort. We're actually an 80 year old  communications law firm dating back to the 1930s.  
  • And we represent media and broadcasting  companies, but also satellite and different  
  • types of telephony and internet companies. I got  involved in representing broadcasters fairly early  
  • on in my, in my career, I, I left Brooklyn, and  went to college at the University of Michigan,  
  • I was actually the first in my family to  actually leave New York to go to college,  
  • which was sort of unheard of in my family at the  time. And, and then, after college, I applied to  
  • and got into law school down here in Washington,  DC, where I stayed. I started practicing in a  
  • large firm back in the 80s. And one of the first  jobs I got was working with a newspaper company,  
  • the gun net company, which at the time purchased  the LDR e o newspaper in New York. And at my law  
  • firm, they didn't have anybody who spoke Spanish,  and they needed somebody who could, you know,  
  • read the articles and understand the articles,  because they were sometimes involved in libel  
  • suits and that sort of thing. And I was the only  guy there that could speak the language. So that  
  • kind of launched me in a career of working with  Spanish language media. I, a few years later,  
  • got the idea of trying to organize a  group of Spanish language radio stations  
  • to form what was then the very, very  first Spanish language broadcasting  
  • Association. We called an order from the  American Hispanic owned radio Association,  
  • something that had never been done before.  I was only three years out of law school. So  
  • I was, I didn't even know what I was doing  at the time. But, but I spoke the language  
  • and those things You and there weren't many  back in those days, Hispanic broadcasters who  
  • actually own their own stations, you know,  they like to speak in their own language,  
  • they felt comfortable with me because I did. And  also because I understood the culture, you know,  
  • back then, if you if you happen to own a Spanish  broadcasting station, a small little a and most  
  • of these guys and and there were a few women who  owned these small am and FM stations out in Texas  
  • or in California, if they came to Washington, and  had to interact with, say, the US government or  
  • the Federal Communications Commission or other  officials, nobody spoke their language. So for  
  • them to have somebody who could represent  them in their own language was a huge plus.
  • Speaker 1: What's the  
  • timeline here? What year  are we talking about around
  • Speaker 2: This would have been  
  • in the late 80s. The American Hispanic owned  radio Association out out was formed in 1989.  
  • And many of those original founders of the  association, you know, they went on to basically  
  • grow some of the biggest broadcasting companies  that we see now they were the founders of SBS  
  • of what is today Univision, of some of the  larger broadcasting companies in the country,  
  • which is funny what nobody would have thought  that that would have happened back then.
  • Speaker 1: So in this time in the 80s,  
  • why was there a need to even start this  particular organization? Why do that,
  • Speaker 2: I think it was the late 80s and early 90s,  
  • where a transitional point for the Hispanic  population here in the US. And I think there  
  • was a recognition that the this demographic in the  US was growing at was having greater influence,  
  • greater economic influence, and the  infrastructure was growing to basically  
  • service that that demographic, a seminal event  was the 1990 census, because the 1990 census  
  • was the first time that the US government  predicted that by the turn of the century Now,  
  • mind you, this is 1990. So they're predicting  the year 2000, that by the turn of the century,  
  • the Hispanic population would become the largest  ethnic minority in the US. And that really sent  
  • shutters through Washington, and by the way  through Wall Street, suddenly, Wall Street  
  • took notice, and realized, wow, that this is going  to be a big group. And we want in so one obvious  
  • major way to reach this, this audience was through  broadcasting. And so that was the beginning of the  
  • growth of Spanish language broadcasting in  the US, that was a major issue back then.
  • 07:56 Speaker 1: What do you think that  
  • did for just in general, the broadcast industry  realizing that this was a reality that was coming?
  • Speaker 2: There was a lot of difficulty in accepting  
  • the fact that Spanish language broadcasting was  a real thing, and that it was there to stay.  
  • You know, and in the 60s and 70s, when I  was when I was, you know, a kid, you know,  
  • Spanish language broadcasting and media was  really relegated to like the bacteria it was,  
  • for those of us who are old enough for those  those weird, fuzzy UHF channels that you could  
  • barely picked up, or, you know, am stations  with really bad signals. And nobody really paid  
  • much attention to it. It was just sort of the  small little back corner of the media industry.  
  • And they still treated it  that way, in the early 90s.  
  • All the while that these companies were really,  really starting to grow. And I think, you know,  
  • for example, there was a major event when  a an FM station in Los Angeles, k LA x,  
  • which was owned by Spanish broadcasting systems,  became the number one station in the Los Angeles  
  • market, not the number one Spanish station, the  number one station, and the other general market  
  • stations could not believe it. They thought  there was a mistake. Howard Stern went on the  
  • air saying, oh, there must be a mistake. Arbitron  messed up their numbers, but no, I mean, it was  
  • when people suddenly had to wake up and realize,  wow, this is a real force to be reckoned with.
  • Speaker 1: So at some point in that  
  • period, you connected with the  Federal Communications Commission?
  • Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, I absolutely. As  
  • these groups started to grow. I was working with a  lot of them in helping them with their growth and  
  • purchasing stations and developing new broadcast  stations and during that process, I became friends  
  • with another broadcast attorney in Washington  by the name of William canard, Bill canard.  
  • For those who don't know, Bill canard, he went  on to become the very first African American  
  • chairman of the Federal Communications Commission.  And Bill was working with a lot of minority  
  • business development organizations that were  investing in and helping in the growth of  
  • minority businesses. And so my clients, the, the,  these Hispanic broadcasters, which were having  
  • difficulty finding, financing at times, went  to those organizations. So when Bill was named  
  • chairman of the FCC, he asked me to join him at  the FCC to be among other things, his liaison with  
  • the Hispanic community, which I did, so I was  sort of there to introduce him to the various  
  • civic organizations nclr and Lu lac, and to,  you know, make sure that he was able to get  
  • out to those constituencies to convey the message  that he and that administration wanted to convey
  • Speaker 1: 
  • It could have ever been done, and they ever  had a liaison to the Hispanic community.
  • Speaker 2: Um, at that level, probably not, I mean,  
  • really, a very innovative thing that the FCC  did back then, was that they created an Office  
  • of Communications business opportunities ACO,  and it's still in existence today. And Oppo is  
  • sort of a unique office at the FCC in that it is  an office really devoted to assisting minorities  
  • and women to access the telecommunications and  media marketplace and the s, nd and the processes  
  • of the FCC, because there was an understanding  that these groups may have difficulty getting  
  • into these markets. And it's there to help.  So I was the director of ACO during that time.
  • Speaker 1: Let's talk  
  • a little bit more about the difficulties.  
  • What were the barriers at that time for those  individuals accessing the meeting market?
  • Speaker 2: Well, I mean, in blunt terms,  
  • I mean, there were still and you know, and may  still be there still is a racial discrimination  
  • that exists in the marketplace. Right. So I mean,  if there was difficulty in gaining access to  
  • capital, to acquire stations, there was difficulty  in gate gaining what's called deal flow, which  
  • is sort of knowing what deals are available.  And, you know, they were not the groups that  
  • large broadcast groups, or, or finance  organizations thought to go to, to underwrite  
  • or to provide business opportunities to these  groups. So they, they were usually, you know,  
  • not invited to the table. Or they found out about  the negotiations too late, when all the better  
  • properties were already gone. So, so certainly,  you know, accessing opportunities, and capital and  
  • financing were major obstacles that they ran into,  because keep in mind, you know, back, you know,  
  • everybody thought, Well, you know, minority  businesses, you know, you must be talking about  
  • little grocery stores or little bodega is nobody  thought, Oh, this person wants to buy a radio  
  • station, a radio station, what are you talking  about? minorities don't buy radio stations. You  
  • know, that's, that was sort of the reaction you  got. And so you had to sort of overcome that bias.
  • Speaker 1: Now,  
  • during that time, we also came around  to the Telecommunications Act of 1996,  
  • where bigger was better, and to some extent,  still, it still continues more than 20 years  
  • later, but at that time, you have this new  policy that was promoting larger and larger media  
  • companies. What did that do to this challenge  for broadcasters from underrepresented groups?
  • Speaker 2: Yeah, you know, I mean, you you it was a  
  • double edged sword. I really do think that I mean,  throughout the 90s, even right, leading right up  
  • to the 96 Act, which is that we frequently  referred to the telecom act as the 96 Act.  
  • There had been steady growth in these  Hispanic broadcast groups. Like I said,  
  • earlier, Univision started to really  grow Telemundo really started to grow.  
  • You had HBC which became Univision radio  was growing SBS others the the 96 Act.
  • Speaker 2: basically lifted  
  • didn't entirely left but it  significantly raised ownership caps on  
  • media ownership and To us, and that led to sort of  a buying frenzy. And, and so there was, you know,  
  • groups that were already big we're starting to  get really bad. Yeah, that was the birth of, of  
  • the modern Clear Channel which became net,  which is now I Heart Radio for example and,  
  • and other Sinclair broadcasting on the TV side.  And you saw some of that, by the way, in Hispanic  
  • media. I mean, it was during this period  that, that Univision really grew much bigger  
  • that, that that groups like, back back in  the US, like I said, earlier, you had HBC,  
  • which is spanic Broadcasting Company, which  became Univision radio that they they grew  
  • z, Spanish Radio Network grew very big. And  so they were able to sort of ride that wave,  
  • until eventually they got purchased. I mean, HBC  got big, but then became a member, and then it got  
  • bought by Univision. So what happened was that  there were fewer owners in the marketplace.  
  • And even to this day, if you're going  to get into broadcasting, it's very,  
  • very difficult to compete, no matter what  language you're going to be in, because  
  • you're almost immediately going to be going up  against competition that has not one, not two,  
  • but maybe 567, or eight stations in the market.  And that's a really hard, you know, competitive  
  • environment to enter into. And that's that was the  change in the demographic and the dynamic there.
  • Speaker 1: So you serve with Chairman Connor For how long?
  • Speaker 2: I was at the  
  • FCC for about two and a half years, three years.
  • Speaker 1: And what happened after that?
  • Speaker 2: Well, I mean, we  
  • got into the, into the 2000, you know,  presidential race. We were on the road.  
  • Chairman Canard was a Democrat. Bill  Clinton had already served his two terms. So  
  • al gore was running for president at the time,  if you may recall against George W. Bush.  
  • And, you know, you for your younger audience.  The election really ended up in a deadlock where  
  • really the issue was the Florida electoral  votes, and it actually went, you know,  
  • there was a count there was a recount, there  was then there was a Supreme Court challenge,  
  • Bush v Gore. And at the end, the Supreme Court  prevented a recount, which ultimately gave Bush  
  • the state of Florida, which then  gave Bush the national election. So  
  • basically, when the Republican Party won  the White House, Bill canard left office,  
  • I also went back into private practice, and, and  really have stayed in private practice ever since,  
  • although I've always worked very, very closely and  continue to work closely with with Hispanic media,  
  • although it's it's evolved, right? I  mean, it's not all about broadcasting  
  • anymore. Now it's evolved into a lot of  new and innovative technology. So for me,  
  • it's always an interesting challenge to see where  this is taking me because it started out in the  
  • morning, then went to FM them once a TV and  satellite radio and you know, and satellite TV.  
  • And now, you know, my clients are doing everything  from, you know, podcasting to digital streaming,  
  • to, you know, Ott content. So it's  really diversified pretty dramatically.
  • Speaker 1: Do you see yourself as doing advocacy  
  • as an attorney? Now? You're not in a role with  an organization necessarily, but as an attorney,  
  • are you doing advocacy on behalf of those who are  spanning broadcasts on one against broadcasts?
  • Speaker 2: I do I mean, I do and it's  
  • it's something that I've never really left I mean,  I enjoy doing that I work actually very closely  
  • with the National Association of Broadcasters  the NA B, on on various initiatives they have the  
  • National Association of Broadcasters Educational  Foundation, for example, has a program called  
  • the broadcast leadership training school wide,  which is designed specifically to train the next  
  • generation of women and minority broadcasters  and owners to teach them how to actually  
  • purchase a stay And be owners, the station, I'm on  the faculty, the what they call the BLT program,  
  • the broadcast leadership training program, another  initiative initiative with the NA B two, which is  
  • which is also aimed at access to capital to to  educate banks to make them comfortable lending  
  • to and making capital available to broadcasters  and specifically minority broadcasters. I  
  • frequently submit comments to the FCC. I did just  recently on an incubator program that the FCC just  
  • established to help promote minority ownership.  And I participated there. Yeah, there had been  
  • back in the 90s, something called the minority  tax certificate. And when there were hearings over  
  • the minority tax certificate, I testified to the  House Ways and Means Committee on that. So yeah,  
  • I'm also serving on the board, for example  of the mind of the mmtc and minority media  
  • and telecommunications Council. So I serve  on the Board of various organizations. And  
  • it's something that you know, I think, is still  vitally important, especially now because the  
  • media marketplace is changing so  dramatically. And there's been so much  
  • consolidation on the broadcast front  that these constituencies need a voice.
  • Speaker 1: Speaking about now,  
  • in 2018, at AEJMC annual conference, you  participated in a breakfast with Hispanic Media  
  • Panel Discussion, you kind of recap  some of those current realities,  
  • at least in 2018, that are facing those  who are in Spanish language media.
  • Speaker 2: Yeah, we covered it with a  
  • really interesting panel this morning. I enjoyed  it very much. And we covered a lot of very, very  
  • interesting topics. We had representatives from  the major networks, Univision, and Telemundo there  
  • had another journalist, print, media journalist,  outbreak, Alberto avendano. And, you know,  
  • we covered among other things, how the Hispanic,  Latino, demographic in the US is changing,  
  • it's becoming younger. And in some ways for the  second and third generations of Latinos that they  
  • are, you know, not gravitating necessarily  to Spanish only content that they're looking  
  • perhaps more to, you know, bilingual or trilingual  content. And so, and so that's changing all  
  • the same while that the delivery platforms  are changing, right? I mean, they're not;  
  • this audience is not necessarily tuning in to  telenovelas on Spanish language TV, like they  
  • once did. They're picking up their content  on their, on their smartphones, on YouTube,  
  • on social media, and the like. So Oh, and podcasts  are also exploding enormously. So. So these,  
  • the content, producers have to be on their  game to know how their audiences are changing.  
  • And you know how to reach that audience. We  also even talked about how the news delivery,  
  • and news aggregation is changing, you  know, especially in this administration,  
  • where you have very, very polarized  population, and a lot of editorial content,  
  • as opposed to just, you know, pure news, and  how the the the current political climate  
  • is impacting how that news is being  developed, and disseminated to this  
  • population. So it was a really, really  good discussion. I enjoyed it very much.
  • Speaker 1: One of the things that has been talked about  
  • a lot in the last few years, the last two years  is the political environment, and how that impacts  
  • the way in which journalists do their job apps.  And you know, this program, this project is  
  • talking about trailblazers in journalism. But  many of those trailblazers probably didn't think  
  • about when they were trailblazing a reality  where they could be accused of being fake news  
  • or doing fake news. Right. I'm interested in  your thoughts about the political dynamics for  
  • Hispanic broadcasters, especially given  our current political environment?
  • Speaker 2: Yeah. And this was actually something that  
  • we did talk about on the panel today. And, you  know, I think there is sort of this, this, this  
  • belief, I certainly believe where the line between  news and editorial content is starting to blur  
  • has already blurred. You know,  you, you go on to news channels.  
  • Now, and you don't see a lot of news, you see a  lot of editorial content, right, you see a lot of  
  • opinions, which is not to say that opinions are  bad, there's a role for them. But I think where  
  • it becomes a little dangerous is where something  is, that is, in fact, opinion, is presented as if  
  • it were news. So, you know, it's always been a  challenge, I think, for journalists to try to,  
  • you know, keep those two worlds separate, and  to try to provide, you know, unbiased reporting.  
  • Having said that, with Hispanic media, you know,  that they have an audience and a constituency  
  • that, you know, let's be honest, I think  at times can feel like it's under siege,  
  • right? especially in this day and age, where  there's sort of this, you know, anti immigrant  
  • bat, you know, flavor in the air. And, and so that  there is sort of a role for for media and for news  
  • media, I think, a valuable teachable moment  where they can provide to this constituency,  
  • a very valuable service, as long as they  maintain their you know, and I don't think  
  • there's any problem with, you know, expressing  editorial opinions. Right. I mean, yeah, with that  
  • they did the, the, the Edward R. Murrow speech  about Senator McCarthy, you know, I mean,  
  • there's a long proud history of the press speaking  its opinion when they see something in public life  
  • that they think needs to be pointed out. So I  think there's a role for that. I pointed out,  
  • you know, during the, during the panel  discussion early today that I think one of the  
  • unheralded heroes of all this is is is some of the  local media outlets, the little tiny, you know, am  
  • stations, local newspapers, low power FM stations,  non commercial community broadcast stations,  
  • for example. Because they, you know, provide a  real valuable local service to small, perhaps  
  • insulated Hispanic populations, not you know, I'm  not talking about New York or Chicago or LA, but  
  • I'm talking about small little communities out in  the Midwest. You know, I mentioned Fayetteville,  
  • Arkansas, because Fayetteville Arkansas has  people, some of you may not realize it has a very,  
  • very large Latino population, because there's a  lot of poultry farms there, for example, well,  
  • yeah. So the small stations that are there,  you know, provide an invaluable service. And,  
  • you know, I think that news and content, good news  and content is inherently local. And with these  
  • local populations, they want to have, you know,  useful information about what's going on in their  
  • community. Is my school going to be open or close  today? Where can I go to the grocery store? Where  
  • can I go to get my check cashed in a place where  they speak Spanish? You know, how can I get, you  
  • know, whatever, can I find a lawyer? Can I find an  accountant, a doctor that speaks Spanish, or is my  
  • child sick? You know, that's really the you know,  I mean, that's really the information where,  
  • where the local media outlets can provide a  really valuable service to those communities.
  • Speaker 1: I believe one of the things you do as you require  
  • the universities that own these licenses for  radio stations, talk more about your work there.
  • Speaker 2: Well, I mean, I do I do a lot of and it's funny,  
  • because the, the, the media environment, in, in  academia and with the universities and colleges  
  • is very, very, very, right. I mean, they're  small, medium, and large. I mean, you can  
  • look, for example, to American University  here in Washington, which has a very,  
  • very sophisticated operation with their w hmu.  Station, NPR affiliate, very, very professional,  
  • all the way down to these small little,  you know, Community college stations  
  • that are almost entirely student run and  student organized. But I mean, I have found that  
  • the college and university media outlets  frequently can be the birthplace of some very,  
  • very innovative ideas. You know, for example,  you know, the The the use of podcasting that the  
  • spoken word content and, and the dissemination of  spoken word content through podcasting was really  
  • championed at the at the public broadcasting  level with with these colleges and universities,  
  • and they've done and continue to do incredibly  innovative things, you know, mixing up formats,  
  • multimedia, you know, presentation, displays  of content, you know, mixing and matching,  
  • how they do things, you know, storing of digital  content on a sort of on demand basis, you know,  
  • all those sorts of things. A lot of  times it's, it's, and I think part of it.  
  • I mean, is is because they have this, you know,  young think outside the box, staff, right, that  
  • if you go to some some, you know, established  old, you know, broadcast shops across the country,  
  • you know, people young people are frequently told,  no, we don't do that. No, you can't do that. No,  
  • nobody does that. Nobody. Yeah, no, no, no,  no, no, no, no. Well, you know, at the small  
  • community colleges, there's nobody  there to say no, so they just do it.  
  • And then and lo and behold, it's like, wow, you  know, nobody's ever done that before. What a great  
  • idea. So, you know, sometimes you know, that's  a, that's a, that's a really good thing to have.
  • Speaker 1: Speaking of the universities who own the stations,  
  • you're at. You're at the Association for  education and Journalism and Mass Communication.  
  • We're the largest organization of journalism, Mass  Comm educators? Or do you think we play a role  
  • in this area of preparing students to perhaps  own stations, or create new media outlets? What  
  • are academics able to do in this area of  addressing diversity when they're on air  
  • product? and programming? What do you see  us as educators being able to do about this?
  • Speaker 2: I think you mean, I think you serve an invaluable  
  • role. And all this. I mean, first of all, I  mean, I think, now speaking for myself, I mean,  
  • when I was young and new, I mean, and new to all  this, one of my biggest obstacles, was my own  
  • insecurity, right? I didn't know what questions  to ask. I didn't know, you know, what to say?  
  • Or do and so my reaction would be just to kind of  clam up and just like not, not say anything? Yeah,  
  • I think, certainly an important role of the  educators, I sort of certainty see it this way,  
  • when not when I'm teaching classes  to these young students is, you know,  
  • nothing is, is out of bounds here. You know,  there is no as my father, you say, there's no such  
  • thing as a stupid question. They're only stupid  answers, right? So So, you know, if you if you're,  
  • if you, you know, speak up, we want to hear  and also, you know, instill in them, you know,  
  • try to anticipate some of the obstacles that  they're going to run into, and instill in them,  
  • you know, a, you know, an understanding that,  yes, you're going to run into these problems,  
  • every, you know, things are going to go sideways,  and you need to have a plan B, or a Plan C,  
  • don't be you know, don't be discouraged. And just  kind of say, oh, it just wasn't meant to be No,  
  • I mean, you have to sort of come back then,  then I have many, many clients who, you know,  
  • started their businesses out of the trunk of  their car. And the ones that really succeeded,  
  • were just dogs, they just kept going at it.  And they kept Yeah, they were not discouraged  
  • by by the problems that they were running into  even, you know, even more recent, for example, I  
  • had clients who were like, you know, ran into what  was the brick wall of the Oh, eight market crash,  
  • and they still were like, no, we're gonna  figure out some way so that I can finance this,  
  • this acquisition, so that I can make this happen.  And, you know, it's amazing. They, I mean, I know,  
  • I know, some of these small broadcasters who,  when they buy their first station, they're their  
  • own General Manager, their own program director,  their own general sales manager and their own DJ,  
  • they wear like, six hats, and they do it all.  And, you know, that's, it's, that's what you do.  
  • So I think, you know, instilling in them, you  know, that the idea that this is very doable,  
  • and that it's these are  challenges that they can take on.
  • Speaker 1: Would you buy in 2018,  
  • a radio station or television station?
  • Speaker 2: Yeah, it's a really good question. Because I mean,  
  • one thing that I hear frequently, for example, is  Oh, well broadcasting his dad who would do that?  
  • And, you know, I guess my, my answer to that is,  it really depends. I mean, that's really sort of,  
  • it depends. I mean, you know, oh, would I  buy a broadcasting station that I knew was  
  • going to do well, and make a lot of money?  Well, yeah, I would, you know, so the,  
  • so really, that the, the, the, the, really what  you have to look at is, you know, what are the  
  • market opportunities that are out there? You know,  broadcasting absolutely is not what it once was.  
  • Newspapers aren't what they once were,  hell, you know, those CDs and DVDs and,  
  • and, and, and, and, you know, videotapes aren't  what they once were. But, you know, you, you,  
  • you look to see where the where the opportunities  were? I mean, my answer, I'm not giving an answer.  
  • My answer to your question is that if, if  there was a marketplace, a more niche market,  
  • where a radio station, for example, could really  serve a need in that market, then yeah, I would,  
  • I would absolutely do it, I think I still do  believe that with with broadcasting or any of  
  • what we're talking about, it's really all  ultimately, it's all about the content,  
  • good content, will, you know, people will flock  to new content, no matter what the delivery  
  • system is. And if it's, you know, and if it's, if  it's a, if it's a good, you know, a good program,  
  • whatever, it'll just migrate to  a broader and broader audience,  
  • eventually, through different systems,  people will come to you and say, Hey,  
  • can I grab your content, put it on my station?  If you have it? So it's really what you produce.
  • Speaker 1: What are your  
  • biggest challenges going forward? meaning  in your advocacy in the work you're doing,  
  • the current political environment? What  are your biggest challenges moving forward?
  • Speaker 2: Well, I think certainly right now,  
  • for me, and for my clients is that there is a very  rapidly changing media marketplace right now. And  
  • it's not just I mean, there's, there's always  been a certain amount of change. But I think the,  
  • the, the pace at which the change happens,  it seems to be accelerating. So you know,  
  • for example, you know, I mean, I mentioned earlier  that I'm, I'm running an eight year old law firm,  
  • I'm not 18 years old, but the firm's been  around so this firm has been around through,  
  • you know, you know, it started out with, you  know, Western Union, Telegraph and am and then FM,  
  • and then, you know, VHF TV, UHF TV, digital TV  satellites, those with every, with every shift in  
  • technology, the change has happened more and more  rapidly. Right. So now the changes are happening,  
  • and, you know, at almost breakneck speed, just  as you're getting up to speed on one, something  
  • new is popping up. So a big challenge for me.  And I think for everyone in the marketplace is  
  • staying on top, you know, where, where is my  audience right now? Where are they consuming  
  • media and content, so that I can be there and be  on top of that, that, that, that that's really a  
  • huge, huge challenge. And, you know, and also  integrating all those together because I think  
  • the prepense, the gut reaction,  the propensity is to to say, well,  
  • the new technologies are just going to be  ancillary to the, to the old, stable technology,  
  • right? You know, when I hear somebody say, Oh, you  know, we're a, we're a broadcast company. And if  
  • you like, we can also offer you some streaming  media and a podcast now, that's the ones who  
  • are saying, No, we are a multimedia company.  And we know, for us, as I mentioned earlier,  
  • it's about the content. And we can distribute that  content through a variety of different platforms.  
  • So here's your menu. What would you like and  we can mix it up for you. Would you like,  
  • you know, FM and TV, TV and social media, social  media and podcast and satellite. I mean, how,  
  • you know, how would you like it because I think  really having that the audience demands that  
  • level of flexibility. The advertisers want  that level of targeted access to the audience  
  • and to their customer base, and you have  to be able to offer them what they want.
  • Speaker 1: Frank Montero,  
  • thank you so much for talking with us today.
  • Speaker 2: My pleasure.  
  • I really enjoyed it. Thank you very much.